Yale Law professor Amy Chua has recently been making headlines with her book Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother
Unlike her many critics, I will not question Chua's abilities as a mother and keep my knocking of her to the realm of history. Actually, I think there is a lot to be said for Chua's style of parenting. While not nearly as intense as what Chua describes, my parents were much stricter with me than most of my peer's parents were with them and I benefited from that. The point that Chua makes that struck the strongest chord with me was:
What Chinese parents understand is that nothing is fun until you're good at it. To get good at anything you have to work, and children on their own never want to work, which is why it is crucial to override their preferences. This often requires fortitude on the part of the parents because the child will resist; things are always hardest at the beginning, which is where Western parents tend to give up. But if done properly, the Chinese strategy produces a virtuous circle. Tenacious practice, practice, practice is crucial for excellence; rote repetition is underrated in America. Once a child starts to excel at something—whether it's math, piano, pitching or ballet—he or she gets praise, admiration and satisfaction. This builds confidence and makes the once not-fun activity fun. This in turn makes it easier for the parent to get the child to work even more.
This is a key argument used by educational theorist Daniel Willingham in his book Why Don't Students Like School
I am good with history and enjoy it because I made myself memorize loads of historical facts as a kid and therefore have a baseline knowledge and skills now to read even really difficult works of history. In contrast, I never really developed the necessary skills in reading Talmud. My high school yeshiva education was therefore hell as I floated along accomplishing nothing. Today I have a mental block when it comes to the topic and avoid it. Perhaps I needed a Tiger Mother to drill me into a Talmudic scholar.
3 comments:
I can't speak to her expertise as either a mother or a historian, but I will say she appears to be a brilliant marketer. The controversy over her NYT article will sell lots of copies of her books.
Hi,
I just started reading you.
Go Bucks.
I'll let you know what I think when I know you better.
Jenny
Izgad,
Regarding Gemara, have you tried the Gemara Markings System?
http://www.gemaramarkings.com/
It is relatively easy to adapt to your own personal learning style (I don't use all of the markings, and have innovated some of my own). While the initial learning of a particular daf may not be that enjoyable, even with the system, after you have appropriately annotated that daf--subsequent review becomes much more enjoyable.
If you can identify areas in the Gemara, particular discussions, that are inherently interesting to you, and employ this system, you may experience some of the pleasure of learning Gemara, that some real "Gemara junkies (my trademark)" feel.
Not that Gemara is everything--Jewish literature is vast, but if you haven't employed this method, and are interested in returning to Gemara, I'd give it a shot (I also unabashedly use Artscroll to know I'm making the most accurate notations).
Post a Comment